Prajakta Ranganathan

Profile description

When a trial judgment leaves you fearing an unjust sentence, the option of a criminal revision can provide a crucial lifeline. Prajakta Ranganathan specializes in filing revisions before the Punjab and Haryana High Court, offering a second chance to correct legal errors that may have slipped through the original trial. Whether the case involves drug‑related charges or allegations under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, the lawyer brings a focused strategy to each petition.

Prajakta Ranganathan has built a reputation over fifteen years of practice as a diligent advocate in the High Court. The lawyer earned a Bachelor of Laws from Guru Nanak Dev University and completed a master’s program concentrating on criminal jurisprudence. Early assignments placed the lawyer alongside senior counsels in complex revision matters, providing exposure to appellate techniques that sharpened an eye for procedural irregularities, mis‑application of law, and evidentiary gaps. Since then, the lawyer has successfully handled dozens of revisions that resulted in reduced sentences, remand orders, and even outright reversal of convictions.

A criminal revision is appropriate when a lower court’s decision contains a legal flaw that impacts the verdict. Prajakta Ranganathan regularly assists clients by reviewing trial transcripts, charge sheets, and judgment notes to pinpoint errors such as improper admission of evidence, incorrect interpretation of statutory provisions, or violation of the right to a fair trial. The lawyer drafts a concise revision petition that cites relevant High Court and Supreme Court precedents, arguing why the earlier judgment should be set aside. In a recent case involving a wrongful conviction for theft, the lawyer highlighted that the trial judge had ignored a key alibi witness, leading the High Court to order a fresh trial and secure the client’s release.

In NDND (Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances) matters, the stakes are especially high due to mandatory minimum sentences and social stigma. Prajakta Ranganathan can help individuals accused under the NDPS Act by challenging the legality of the search, questioning the chain of custody of seized substances, and scrutinizing expert testimony on quantity and purity. The lawyer has obtained acquittals by demonstrating that the measurement techniques used by the prosecution were scientifically unsound, and by establishing that the alleged possession did not meet the quantity thresholds that trigger severe penalties. The approach blends meticulous fact‑finding with a deep understanding of NDPS jurisprudence, ensuring that every argument is grounded in the latest judicial interpretations.

Defence in POCSO cases demands sensitivity, thorough investigation, and a command of protective legislation. Prajakta Ranganathan regularly represents clients accused under the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, focusing on safeguarding the client’s procedural rights while addressing the seriousness of the allegations. The lawyer examines whether the investigation respected the child’s rights, whether proper forensic procedures were followed, and whether the evidence presented meets the high threshold required for conviction. By presenting expert psychology reports and corroborative alibi evidence, the lawyer has secured dismissals in cases where the prosecution’s narrative relied on coerced statements or unreliable testimony.

Across all matters, Prajakta Ranganathan keeps communication clear and expectations realistic. The lawyer’s presence in the Punjab and Haryana High Court is marked by precise arguments and a steadfast commitment to safeguarding constitutional rights.

If you suspect a trial error, face NDPS charges, or confront a POCSO allegation, Prajakta Ranganathan can evaluate your case promptly, outline the strongest legal path, and work toward a fair resolution in the Punjab and Haryana High Court.

Criminal Law Practice Areas