Tharun Dahiya

Profile description

When a lower‑court verdict leaves you facing a harsh prison term, the final avenue for redress may lie in a Special Leave Petition (SLP) before the Supreme Court of India. Tharun Dahiya specialises in navigating this complex terrain, offering clients a strategic pathway to challenge convictions at the nation’s highest bench.

An SLP is not an automatic right of appeal; it requires the Supreme Court to grant special leave based on a perceived miscarriage of justice or a substantial question of law. Tharun meticulously assesses whether the case contains such gravitas, assembles precedent‑laden submissions, and frames arguments that persuade the apex judges to intervene.

The lawyer holds an LL.B. from Delhi University and an LL.M. in constitutional criminal law from the University of Delhi. With over fourteen years of practice exclusively before the Supreme Court, Tharun has honed a reputation for incisive legal research, lucid drafting, and compelling oral advocacy that resonates with the Bench.

Procedural exactness is paramount before the Supreme Court. The lawyer is adept at complying with Order VII of the Supreme Court Rules, filing SLPs within the strict ninety‑day window, and attaching requisite annexures such as certified copies of lower‑court judgments and evidentiary extracts. This precision prevents dismissals on technical grounds.

Beyond filing, Tharun crafts meticulous grounds of appeal that juxtapose the trial court’s reasoning with established Supreme Court jurisprudence. The lawyer highlights contradictions, overlooks of legal principles, and instances where the Supreme Court has previously overruled similar findings. By presenting a clear legal roadmap, the lawyer maximises the chance of leave being granted.

Notable achievements include securing leave in a high‑profile murder conviction where the Supreme Court directed a fresh hearing after the lawyer exposed a procedural lapse that denied the accused the right to cross‑examine a key witness. Another triumph involved a reduction of a ten‑year sentence to five years after the Court accepted a criminal review petition that identified non‑compliance with Article 21 of the Constitution.

Clients value the lawyer’s forthright communication style. Tharun explains each stage of the SLP process, sets realistic expectations regarding timelines—often spanning months to a year—and advises on interim relief such as bail or suspension of sentence pending the Court’s decision. The lawyer regularly updates families on docket status and any oral hearing schedules.

While the apex Court’s intervention is decisive, the lawyer also evaluates parallel remedies, including filing a review petition under Article 137, seeking a stay of execution, or pursuing a plea for compassionate release. Tharun’s holistic approach ensures that every possible ladder of appeal is considered, preserving the client’s rights at each level.

Supreme Court matters attract media attention. The lawyer advises discretion, prepares concise press statements when necessary, and safeguards the client’s privacy throughout. By coordinating with reputable public‑relations consultants, Tharun helps prevent misinformation from influencing public opinion or the Court’s perception of the case.

Integrity guides each action. Confidentiality, adherence to the Supreme Court’s code of conduct, and unwavering respect for judicial authority are foundational principles. This ethical backbone bolsters the lawyer’s credibility with both clients and the Bench, fostering an environment where justice can be pursued with confidence.

Criminal Law Practice Areas